Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Urgent alert: North Carolina to turn all homeopaths, naturopaths, midwives into FELONS

NaturalNews Insider Alert (www.NaturalNews.com ) - please forward


This is a breaking news alert from NaturalNews.

North Carolina is voting on a bill TONIGHT that would criminalize homeopaths, naturopaths, midwives, herbalists and anyone else who practices "non-conventional medicine." They would all be arrested as felons, rounded up, prosecuted and sent to prison for "practicine medicine" without a conventional medical license.

Read our full report by Ethan Huff at:
http://www.naturalnews.com/031953_medical_practice_licensing.html

You can see the proposed language of the bill yourself at:
http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2011/Bills/Senate/PDF/S31v2.pdf


We warned you that this was coming! This is the complete tyranny of the medical police state now being brought to bear against the healers of North Carolina. Healers will become felons under this bill, which turnsherbalists into Class I Felons and essentially criminalizes all REAL medicine that exists outside the corrupt state licensing boards which are dominated by pharma interests.

Natural medicine is becoming too powerful, you see, and the corrupt, criminal-minded pushers of pharma poison, chemotherapy and radiation have decided they must round up and imprison all the natural healers in order to maintain their dominance over health treatments.

Your help is urgently needed:

* Forward this email to anyone who needs to know about this.

* CALL the NC Governor's office at (202) 624-5833 and loudly and forcefully insist that this bill is pure medical madness.

* Call the North Carolina House at (919) 733-7928 with the same message.


Also breaking today: Japan is release 2.4 million gallons of radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean. And this level of release is going to happen again and again as more radioactive water keeps being produced there. The mass irradiation of the Pacific Ocean has begun.

Your government is lying to you about this entire story, and now the EPA is about to raise the "allowable" levels of iodine-131 radiation by thousands of times in order to be able to declare the coming radioactive fallout to be completely "safe." The way to protect America from radioactive fallout, it seems, is to simply redefine it. Suddenly it's all declared SAFE by the EPA!

Seriously: I couldn't make this stuff up. The level of insanity that has infected the minds of those running our state and national governments has become intolerable. We are living through a circus of criminality at every level among the so-called "leaders" who claim to be running our country. Their actions put hundreds of millions of people at risk in North America alone...

We will be covering this breaking news in an upcoming feature story on NaturalNews.com. If you're not yet subscribed to NaturalNews, sign up now (it's free) to receive a daily email from me, containing breaking news for that day. We protect your email address and do NOT sell it to anyone. You can unsubscribe at any time. Register at http://www.naturalnews.com/ReaderRegistration.html


Thank you and stay safe,

- Mike Adams, the Health Ranger


Beverly Perdue, the Governor of North Carolina, one of Obama's Councilor of Ten, Is a New World Order Operative; there also have been recent covert moves there to give the supposedly advisory regional Councils of Government more power than local governments throughout that state. -- REC

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Wisconsin Superior Court Judge Blocks Implementation of Union-Busting/Stealth Commons Privatization Law


MADISON, Wis. – A Wisconsin judge on Thursday did what thousands of pro-union protesters and boycotting Democratic lawmakers couldn't, forcing Republican Gov. Scott Walker to halt plans to implement a law that would strip most public workers of their collective bargaining rights and cut their pay.

Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi, who had issued an order intended to block implementation of the law while she considered a challenge to its legitimacy and warned of sanctions for noncompliance, amended her order Thursday to clarify that the law had not taken effect, as Republican leaders argued it had.

The governor's top aide, Department of Administration Secretary Mike Huebsch, later issued a statement saying Walker would comply with Sumi's order and halt preparations that were under way to begin deducting money from most public workers' paychecks, but that the governor's administration still believes the law took effect after a state office unexpectedly published online.



http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_wisconsin_budget_unions

Vaccines Being Pushed in an Organized Campaign by Pharmaceutical Cartel Lobbyists in US State Legislatures


Vaccines Being Pushed in an Organized Campaign by Pharmaceutical Cartel Lobbyists in US State Legislatures
http://www.wellbeingjournal.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=629&Itemid=

Rapid Resistant Response to FBI Criminal Charges Filed Against Washington State Health Secretary

www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/us.../news.php?q..

Film/Federal Lawsuit Document WHO-US Government Forced Vaccination Quarantine Plan in 2009 by Deborah Dupre'
http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/film-documents-forced-vaccination-quarantine-plan


To the Editors/Staff of The Seattle Times

March 23, 2011

To the Editors/Staff of The Seattle Times:

When I several times attempted to post the comments below on Carol Ostrom's one-sided article on the latest unconstitutional Washington State vaccines exemptions bill,

Vaccine Skeptics Protest Bill Requiring Doc's Note

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2014573388_vaccinesbill23m.html

I was blocked from posting them to your website. First I was told that my longstanding password was invalid; then when I wasted time resetting my former password, the "Comments" link would not work.

This also follows your failure to follow through on documented information I have been sending you for the past two years concerning the ineffectiveness and harmfulness of vaccinations, some of which came from primary source government documents drawn from the CDC's own databases. Your newspaper has not done due diligence in fairly and thoroughly investigating vaccinations on the basis of all available information, but have only continued to parrot our corporate government's propaganda.

So I am going to to perform the due diligence that you have failed to do. I am going to report on all of this in an article I am going to write for international circulation about how the widespread opposition to this bill has been systematically suppressed, both in the Washington State legislature and this state's corporate-controlled media, of which you newspaper is an excellent example.

The fact that you are now covering this story in so belated and one-sided a fashion on your front page shows that the corporate forces that you represent are greatly alarmed at increasing public opposition to the vaccinations you and they have striven so mightily to promote for their own considerable but conscienceless profit.

Yours all too truly,

Rebecca Em Campbell


For the third time in three years, the Washington State legislature is attempting to pass legislation in some form undermining parental rights to religious and philosophical vaccination exemption for their children according with the first, fourth and fourteenth amendments of the US Constitution.

What is remarkable is that similar bills had been defeated in 2009, 2010 and years before on the basis of their being unconstitutional; one therefore wonders on what legal or logical basis their successors have been once again been proffered, since -- as far as can be determined by this witness given the present level of government transparency -- the US constitution has not been amended in the interim. Nor do the majority of Washington State legislators seem to be concerned that if they pass this unconstitutional legislation, it inevitably will be challenged in court, wasting large amounts of now allegedly scarce tax payer dollars.

Which brings us to the issue that I term the "CAFR scam": the practice of corporate governments at all levels offering a public budget of a certain stated amount, while concealing in their comprehensive annual financial reports (CAFRs) the actual funds that these governments have in dedicated trust funds. This is so they can quietly retain approximately two-thirds of taxpayer monies/public trust funds for corporate investments rather than for rebates or direct services to the people, thereby enriching their corporate masters, who in turn enrich government officials with corporate stocks, campaign contributions and bribes.

The ongoing version of the CAFR scam within the Washington State government would seem would seem to explain why its corporate officials in both the legislative and executive branches have ruthlessly and have relentlessly attempted to push vaccinations at the expense of the people of Washington State, despite such attempts' lack of support, lack of legality and lack of principle.

Here, gleaned from the CAFR of the Washington State Investment Board, are figures of corporate pension fund investments in the pharmaceutical industry made by the Washington State government in 2010 that would seem to be extremely relevant to the question at hand: there are state corporate investments in Bayer AG, CSL, GlaxoSmithKline-GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche Holdings AG, Sanofi Synthelab and Syngenta AG that total 538.5 million dollars -- over a half billion dollars -- in the international pharmaceutical industry, whose products the Washington State government is now seeking to push on the parents of this state and their children with this proposed unconstitutional legislation.

So it would seem that, not only does the Washington State government have a huge investment in the international pharmaceutical cartel, but a huge conflict of interest in so forcefully pushing the product of this industry in which they have so lavishly invested. It would also seem that those state officials who have personal stock portfolios invested in the pharmaceutical industry like the state has public investments, might be wise to recuse themselves from voting on this bill. Otherwise, if this bill passes into law and is inevitably challenged in court as, not only unconstitutional, but showing conflicts of interest, both public and private, they, along with the Washington State government, may be shown to be seriously compromised.

More Links and Comments from Rebecca Campbell

Today, the Washington State legislature passed the back-door forced vaccinations bill that effectively limits parental exemptions, and the West Virginia Supreme Court yesterday found in favor of public health officials barring/expelling from the public schools any child exempted by parents from the unduly heavy CDC-recommended vaccination schedules. This shows that US state governments are as irremediably corrupt as the federal government, and that the American people have no recourse but to exponentially multiply what was recently done in Wisconsin and engage in widespread informal secession from the empire until we have reclaimed our national and individual freedom and sovereignty. -- REC


Vaccines Being Pushed in an Organized Campaign by Pharmaceutical Cartel Lobbyists in US State Legislatures

http://www.wellbeingjournal.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=629&Itemid=

Rapid Resistant Response to FBI Criminal Charges Filed Against Washington State Health Secretary

www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/us.../news.php?q..

Film/Federal Lawsuit Document WHO-US Government ForcedVaccination Quarantine Plan in 2009 by Deborah Dupre'
http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/film-documents-forced-vaccination-quarantine-plan


Summary

Campbell vs. the United States (Sebelius): Comprehensive Constitutional Lawsuit Against Forced Vaccinations/Medical Martial Law-Amended Complaint

1. There presently exists a bank-based transnational corporate crime syndicate that continues to violate the fundamental constitutional rights and well-being of the American people, including those of the plaintiff, through fraudulent political, legal and financial contracts in the form of surreptitiously signed/enacted international treaties and federal laws/executive orders enabling, among other flagrant unconstitutional abuses of human and civil rights, the mandated imposition of bioweaponized H1N1 influenza vaccinations and quarantines/detentions through medical martial law. The aforementioned measures, being fraudulent, are therefore null and void, with no legitimate power to be enforced by any government, national or international, upon the American people.

2. Controlled by the same bank-based transnational corporate syndicate that now controls the United States government and virtually all of the major national governments of the world, as well as the international pharmaceutical industry, the privately-controlled United Nations World Health Organization (UN-WHO) has fraudulently declared, without any scientific justification, the highest possible Level 6 Pandemic Emergency for an indefinite period of time, which is akin to an unlimited medical "war on terror".

3. Level 6 Pandemic Emergency status gives the WHO, by various international agreements signed by the US government and by various federal executive orders, as well by various laws surreptitiously approved by the US Congress and supported by the US Supreme Court, indefinite control over this nation and its people, subverting the US Constitution, the US Bill of Rights, the American Declaration of Independence and all federal, state and local laws, and therefore the US government and its public health agencies, whose chief administrators are the four complicit federal defendants named in this case.

4. These actions violate the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence; it is therefore these very oracles of human freedom that must now be invoked to protect the American people from the unconstitutional actions of their own federal government, including its public health agencies and their chief administrators, the four complicit federal defendants named in this case.

5. However, through a series of judicial decisions over the past forty years, repeatedly citing as their basis Article III of the US Constitution and the doctrine of "sovereign immunity" spuriously derived from the Eleventh Amendment, the federal courts –

particularly the US Supreme Court unduly influenced by the abovementioned transnational corporate interests, has both unconstitutionally and unconscionably restricted the standing of American citizens to file suit against the federal government to protect their freedoms under the First and Seventh Amendments to the US Constitution found in the US Bill of Rights, which subsumes in preeminence all other articles of the US Constitution, including Article III and the Eleventh Amendment. It is these unconstitutionally and unconscionably restrictive judicial precedents of federal court rulings excessively limiting the standing of citizens of the United States to sue the federal government in defense of their constitutional rights that the plaintiff also wishes to challenge in this amended suit against the United States government itself, as well as against the four federal public health officials listed as complicit federal defendants in this case.

6. The plaintiff therefore demands of the court:

a. That the Court immediately grant an Injunction for relief in these matters, thereby revoking, by authority of the 1st, 4th, 5th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, and 14th Amendments of the US Constitution, as well as by the authority of the American Declaration of Independence from the royally chartered corporations of the British Empire any powers spuriously presumed by the federal government, now or in the future, through executive orders or international agreements issued/signed by any officials, past or present, of the federal government; that any officials of the federal government be thereby forbidden, now or in the future, to commit perjury concerning the alleged benefits or efficacy of any suspiciously derived/designed mandatory or voluntary vaccination, thus engaging in fraudulent financial contracts with their makers; to attempt to abridge the freedom of the press; to declare unilaterally any corporate legal immunity to the purveyors of vaccines for said vaccinations; to unilaterally and surreptitiously impose through federal treaties/laws/executive orders federally mandated vaccinations/quarantines/ detentions/international governments upon the American people; or for the federal government to use unconstitutionally restrictive federal judicial rulings denying the American people their right to defend their constitutional rights in federal court, thus making their political contract with the people fraudulent, and therefore null and void;

b. That the Court order a Special Prosecutor to convene a grand jury investigation based upon the abovementioned allegations by the authority vested in this Court and its Special Prosecutor to prevent any possible injury to the American people by means of any aforementioned possible federally mandated martial law, with enforced vaccinations/quarantines/ detentions and overly restrictive rulings on standing made by the federal courts, denying the American people the standing to defend their constitutional rights in a court of law;

c. That the Court order an investigation of this matter by the Special Prosecutor under the Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations Section (RICO-USC 18) of the Organized Crime Control Act (OCCA) of 1970, particularly its Sections 175-Prohibition with Respect to Biological Weapons; 241-Conspiracy Against Rights; 1031-Fraud Against the United States; 1091-Genocide; 2384-Seditious Conspiracy; 2382-Misprision of Treason and 2384-Seditious Conspiracy, as well as theSherman Antitrust Act of 1890,whose farsighted provisions have been largely ignored by the US government since the latter half of the twentieth century;

d. That the Court order an investigation by the Special Prosecutor of persons and organizations who may be responsible in an effort to prevent any planned imposition of enforced bioweaponized vaccinations/medical law and fraudulent waste of taxpayers' money in needless dangerous vaccinations, as well as the repeal of all federal laws, foreign treaties and executive orders allowing same, and all judicial precedents unconstitutionally and unconscionably restricting the standing of US citizens to defend their constitutional rights in a court of law; that all of the above may trigger a formal government and/or independent investigation of these illegal governmental actions, similar to those now ongoing against the World Health Organization and its associated pharmaceutical corporations/corporate-controlled nonprofit foundations in Europe by the Council of Europe, the European Parliament and various European national governments after criminal charges were initially filed against the WHO and its aforementioned associated organizations by another pro se plaintiff in Vienna, Austria on April 8, 2009.


Text-Campbell vs. the United States (Sebelius): Comprehensive Constitutional Federal Case Against Forced Vaccinations/Medical Martial Law-Amended Complaint
http://nowisthetime.us


OTHER SELECTED EVIDENTIARY WEBLINKS

Martial Law and the Militarization of Public Health: the Global H1N1 Influenza Vaccination Program-Michael Chossudovsky, Ph.D

www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14543 -

Journalist Files Charges Against UN/WHO for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder-Barbara Minton, Ph.D. www.naturalnews.com/026503_pandemic_swine_flu_bioterrorism.html-

EU Official Demands National Investigations into WHO's False H1N1 Flu Pandemic

http://www.wodarg.de/english/3066623.html

Vaccinations: Deadly Immunity-Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

www.globalresearch.ca/index.phpcontext=va&aid=14510 -

"The Rockefeller Syndicate", Chapter 10-Murder by Injection-Eustace Mullins

www.whale.to/b/mullins7.html -

Criminal Charges Filed by Jane Burgermeister with the FBI and City/State Prosecutor in Vienna, Austria-April 8, 2009/July 22, 2009
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18577232/Criminal-Charges-Jane-Burgermeister-to-gov-Mon-Jun-22-2009-at-559-PM

Vaccine skeptics protest bill requiring doctor's note to opt out

A proposal to make it more difficult for parents to avoid school-entry immunization requirements has raised the ire of opponents, who say the requirement is insulting and violates their parental rights.

Seattle Times health reporter

Worried by outbreaks of contagious diseases such as measles and whooping cough, public-health officials are supporting a proposal to make it more difficult for parents to avoid school-entry immunization requirements.

The measure under consideration has drawn strong support in both houses of the Legislature and faced little opposition until recently, when vaccine-resisting parents mobilized to pack hearings and lobby lawmakers.

The proposal would require parents who seek exemption from current state law to submit proof that a health provider has informed them of the risks and benefits of immunization.

Currently, parents can sign a form themselves to claim religious, philosophical or personal reasons for refusing to immunize their children before enrolling them in school or day care.

Public-health officials say the bill is needed because immunization rates are falling, parents are receiving sketchy information from the Internet and the state has made it too convenient for them to skip immunization.

"Convenience is not a reason to risk our children's health, and countering misinformation requires a conversation with a trusted and informed health-care provider," Dr. Gary Goldbaum, Snohomish Health District health officer, told lawmakers. "This is a matter of protecting our most vulnerable citizens: our children."

But more than 100 protesters who showed up at committee hearings this month weren't buying that.

"This bill implies that I am reckless, irresponsible and uninformed, when in fact that is the complete opposite," bristled Sarah Rowe, a Bainbridge Island mother who attended a Senate committee hearing last week with her 5-year-old daughter, whose neurological disorder was caused by a vaccine, according to Rowe.

Michael Belkin, also from Bainbridge, told the committee that as a statistics-savvy financial analyst, he doesn't want to listen to "some doctor's propaganda."

Read more.